Showing posts with label damage control. Show all posts
Showing posts with label damage control. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

I'll get to that next week..


It’s easy to become protective of the work you do.

It’s yours.

You made it.

The automotive industry created or adopted many checks and balances to ensure that work was not only done in the right way, but produced good results. These checks and balances are often called by names like: FMEAs, 8Ds, Design Reviews, Spider charts, and Control Plans. There are other names too.

Bringing these tools into your company can work like a charm in producing amazing high quality high output equipment and product. The charms work when the whole team is engaged in the process of using the tools and enforcing their use.

Let’s take one tool as an example.

The FMEA.


Typically many people are involved with this: the developing engineer, a quality representative, a machine operator, the production engineer, and perhaps two other colleagues contributing to the diligence of the design. Three managers are also involved: the developing engineer’s manager, the program manager of the project, and the production manager.

Why so many people?


When you’re a part of creating something, it becomes yours. You get protective of change and defensive on function. Perhaps you’ll even let a few things slide. It’s human nature. As part of a team, you might let someone off the hook if they missed a few things or give them the ‘few extra days’ they’ve requested to make something right.

The check is the document as proof of the work.


(the machine if not designed in a thoughtful, risk-assessed, BEA way will break down though not always immediately!)
The balance is the pool of managers who make sure the work is done.


If the checks and balances are thrown off, it’s possible that all the work might not get completed. It’s possible that a machine run-off won’t occur, that needed fixes get put off indefinitely, that a machine could break down often, and people won’t get trained.

Sometimes the root cause of a problem goes deeper than its immediate ‘obvious’ fix.
How is the process of checks and balances working in your company?

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

communication & leadership



I finally watched the latest Alice in Wonder land film this weekend. With all the special effects and quirky characters, what I remember most actually is a new word, “muchness” defined early in the movie when The Mad Hatter explained to Alice that she had lost her much-ness, as in she had been so much more.


I like this new word. Let’s consider the muchness of people, leaders we know.


Have you ever witnessed someone to lose their muchness? …Their moxy? …Their rapport? ..Their cover?


It’s amazing how quickly your trust, respect, and “follow-ship” of a leader can be annihilated. I recently witnessed just this phenomenon. In this situation, the leader felt compelled to give grandiose speeches via email paired with long spaces of time between communications and avoided questions from others.


Was the intent to be cryptic? Controlling? Passive aggressive? Persuasive? This could also have been someone incredibly busy, prone to thinking out-loud, and not considering the relationship with the team.


Then this leader avoided, as in didn’t show up to a critical meeting with her team.

Unfortunately, whether meaning to or not, her cover was blown, her “muchness” removed, and her “follow-ship” erased.


Any benefit of the doubt was removed due to blatant disrespect.


The trap can be easy to fall into. How you are perceived by others is their reality of you. Constant communication helps to correct misconceptions and to keep conversation going.

What opinions are you holding of someone that a conversation might clear up?

What has caused you to lose “follow-ship” of a leader?

Tuesday, March 2, 2010

damage control


One of the first steps in correcting a problem is reducing the damage the current situation is causing. This involves protecting the customer, protecting employees, seeking out all the affected product, and taking extra steps to ensure bad product is discovered while production continues.

What about public perception and communication?


If you've ever been involved with correcting an issue with a customer, and I'm pretty sure if you're reading this, you have, you well know that communication to your customer is vital.

Communication to those unaffected is vital as well.


Transparency is a huge relationship and trust builder.


Check out this report from Gerson Lehrman Group to hear what industry experts have to say about the recent Toyota product failures.

What are your customers and others saying about you?

as a side note - I think this is one of the best internet articles regarding the Toyota recall