Showing posts with label effective. Show all posts
Showing posts with label effective. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 2, 2010

participation

When you participate:

  • you effect,
  • you change,
  • you experience.

As much as we’re the same, I find that we’re also very much unique in how we approach oppor- tunities and problems.  (For example, several of you will look at those two words and think them the same thing)

This unique quality is what I love about working in teams.  Team work simply makes whatever it is you’re working on better.  Constructive participation by everyone creates trust, confidence, momentum, and a better product.

Similarly, participation in our community will make everything better too –

  • If you volunteer, you directly effect the quality of someone’s life
  • If you donate, you increase the security of someone’s life
  • If you help your neighbor, your relationship is stronger, he’s encouraged to help someone else, your neighborhood is better, and it spreads.
  • If you vote, your country will have leaders who represent its views

In my opinion of course.

Please vote today.

Friday, November 6, 2009

Lions, tigers, and bears..


Actually, more like: lions, beavers, and golden retrievers.


At my previous company I would periodically take those little self-evaluation tests to figure out my general personally type. This was typically done during a team off-site and the results would be anticipated.


Of course Larry is a “Retriever”.


Sure enough, the test results showed that Mary is a strong driver but with a tall yellow bar too.


For myself, I was always a driver but like reading horoscopes, I saw a little of myself in each description of the lion, otter, golden retriever, and beaver.


Sometimes we’d have to wear these little personality name tags in the office and when we’d tire of this display; we’d hang them in our office for people to see. Supposedly this would help others work with us better.


How exactly am I supposed to give a Retriever information?


How do I more effectively ask a Beaver to do something?


Wouldn’t it be easier if I just knew what to get from others to do my work more effectively?


We all go to work wanting to do a good job. Everyone there, like everyone you might notice in your neighborhood, at church, or in the grocery store, is a mixed bag of nuts. We’re all different. We all have our own idiosyncrasies. We all have our own perceptions based on our upbringing. Some even have their own agendas.


How can we work together better?


While understanding your colleagues and knowing them personally always benefits, one doesn’t always have the opportunity to understand how someone works.


  • You could be new on a team.
  • Your team could be located at several locations.
  • Understanding someone else’s personality type might not be your gift.


There are many reasons why knowing yourself better is the key to getting information presented to you as you need to do your job more effectively verses leaving it to someone else's interpretation. Things like:


  • What questions should you ask to fill in the gaps in your mind?
  • How should you lay out your work for your brain to process quicker?
  • When should you slow down to let others catch up?

Just as in personal relationships, understanding your very own unique way of processing information, will make you more effective in all you do.

Tuesday, June 9, 2009

The problem with training:


Good Intentions.


I was flying recently and while listening to the flight attendant talk about how to use the oxygen masks it got me thinking about training. There is no actual hands-on training for a flight crash situation for us lay people. The attendant doesn't give us all the information either - like the fact of not getting your own oxygen mask on quickly is imperative in a loss of pressure situation as otherwise you'll be unconscious in 15 seconds.


That's good information, yes?

Akin to reading leadership and self help books, it's all good information but there are no hands on practice. Overcoming bad habits and learning new methods is possible with workshop and accountability based training.


Reading books on leadership, problem solving, strategic planning, software development, time management and while this list really could go on and on as you know the point is, reading books for purpose of development is –and how can I say this politely: “nice”.


Reading books as a group allows for some camaraderie and spontaneous discussion. Reading books is self affirming as often you read about ideas that you currently execute. Reading books is helpful as they give you ideas on how to improve and the methods in how to apply them. Reading books can only take you so far.


The same goes for attending a live training class. Training classes are great for two reasons. First, training exists for most major job skills. Second, it’s pretty easy to send someone to training. Because skills are taught by an ‘outside’ person, one can be vulnerable and ask questions without fear of looking bad in front of their supervisor. As an aside, this is also why I don’t advocate joining your team in the training unless it truly is something new to all of you.

The intention is a good one: you recommend books and send your colleagues to training so that they will better themselves and better the company.


But, what happens after the training?

  • What gets implemented?
  • What new is executed?
  • How much better is that person at their job?
  • How will they react in a critical moment?

We all go to work wanting to do a good job. We all want to be the dynamic leader we read about. We all want to be the fast problem solver and the most effective salesmen.


Q: But how?


A: Hands on practice, follow up and accountability over time.


Frankly if you as a manager don’t ask what was implemented from new learning or if you don’t ask to see details illustrating that a better method was employed, why should that employee change?


What do you do to encourage higher margins, permanent root cause problem solving, and effective leadership to those on your team?


Image credit: Daniel Iggers. See more pictures by him here: